Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Peer Guardian

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Family Friendly Mascot Buffalobiian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Amaburi
    Age
    35
    Posts
    18,956
    Well, I never considered it for P2P protection, but it was one of the things I had a look at for immunization functions and stuff. I had second thoughts after reading this though

    Quote Originally Posted by Wikipedia
    Content of the list and criticism

    Since at least 2006[4], the P2P blocklist used by PeerGuardian has been provided by an entity called "Bluetack Internet Security Solutions". ("Bluetack" was the name of the member of the original PeerGuardian team who owned its previous domain peerguardian.net and created the "Block List Manager" used to maintain the list.[2]) The PeerGuardian developers claim to have no control over Bluetack's list, yet refuse to promote or link to alternative lists, even in addition to Bluetack's.

    PeerGuardian/Bluetack have been criticized for overly broad blocking based on unsubstantiated evidence.

    PeerGuardian acknowledges that Battlefield 2, Blizzard, Steam, and ArenaNet connectivity is blocked, which creates problems for many online gaming users who are not aware that PeerGuardian will break game connectivity, and are thus directed to read the manual.

    In 2007, Bluetack/PeerGuardian 2 were criticized for blocking denis.stalker.h3q.com, the second largest Bittorrent tracker as of December 2007, as an "Anti-P2P" address, and claiming that its maintainers (whose tracking software "Opentracker" is also used by The Pirate Bay) were conspiring with the MPAA and MediaDefender.[5] The maintainers are members of the Chaos Computer Club (CCC), a long-standing association of hackers and freedom of information activists, and had also briefly run their tracker from the CCC's own network. Bluetack also blocked CCC itself, accusing it of doing "anti-P2P work" and being a "threat" to file sharers, while others pointed to the fact that the CCC had been publicly defending P2P for years, and even called for boycotting the music industry to protest its file sharing lawsuits.[6]

    Although IP addresses of government and business entities are easily added to a list of IP addresses to be blocked, there is no means for PeerGuardian to block access by a government or business using an undocumented IP address to identify people engaged in software piracy or criminal misconduct.
    As for utorrent, I think it's safe enough. With the auto hash check/ban function, the only thing I can think of that can go wrong is an actual program security hole (one ever existed to my knowledge, and it's patched). That or gov't tracking. Is gov't tracking a bit problem these days? I'm living down under, and I don't think our gov't gives a damn at this point.

    Interesting point though, is that they did push forth a bill to have compulsory ISP level content filtering, and can only be taken off by direct request of the account owner. Over 50% reacted negatively in the latest Australian Broadband Survey.

    If it's not Isuzu-chan Mii~

  2. #2
    Awesome user with default custom title KrayZ33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Age
    36
    Posts
    4,454
    I came across this program when I checked the logfile from uTorrent and it said "piece xxxx failed hash check" or something similiar to that, and tried to redownload it 10 times...

    So, its not usefull? (I don't know what to read out of this article, because " Internet " is not my field of expertise :/, I just go with the "stream"

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •