Funny Pic

[shinta|hikari]

Semantics, and no.

All I am saying is that you should not try to prove a point using fake evidence, even if the point is actually true AND even if the fake evidence actually does occur in reality. Whether children are affected by sex to what degree is debatable, but this point is black and white.

[Animeniax]

Semantics, and no.

All I am saying is that you should not try to prove a point using fake evidence, even if the point is actually true AND even if the fake evidence actually does occur in reality. Whether children are affected by sex to what degree is debatable, but this point is black and white.

That's fine but by that logic we shouldn't believe anything as portrayed in media unless we can verify it with actual experience and visual proof. By that logic you believe you are immortal because you aren't dead yet.

Your point that we should view this seriously hinges on the assumptions that this is both realistic and painful. Your last few posts pointed how this is fake but real.

It's just a joke, like many other advertisements.

It's a reenactment of a real situation. See my comment above to shinta.

Implying that you only see children either masturbating or screaming when they see sex which I don't agree to at all.

Children have a pretty limited scope of emotions that coincide with their limited life experience and exposure to situations. However, I was being facetious about being aroused at the thought/sight of you seeing your parents boning, since you all seem so much more sexually uninhibited.

[shinta|hikari]

That's fine but by that logic we shouldn't believe anything as portrayed in media unless we can verify it with actual experience and visual proof. By that logic you believe you are immortal because you aren't dead yet.

If by actual experience you mean anything proven scientifically then your analogy is fallacious. It has been proven that people die. It does not have to be personal experience, but it has been proven that humans die, and that we are humans, and the conclusion is obvious.

What you are saying is that children are traumatized by seeing sex (unproven unless you actually provide valid proof) by providing fake evidence.

In the end, all that is irrelevant. Please don't use fake evidence to argue your case, period.

EDIT: Just to be clear since it does not seem to be going through, I am not arguing about the effect of seeing sexual acts on children. I am simply saying that using fake evidence to argue a point is incorrect.